Kicking Out Shoshana Review: Gal Gadot’s Sports Comedy Misses the Mark on Humor and Homophobia

58 Views
93 Comments

When I first heard about “Shoshana Halutz Merkazi” (or “Kicking Out Shoshana” as it’s known in English), I admit, my curiosity was piqued mostly because Gal Gadot stars in it. You know how it is—her presence alone often shoots up your expectations, right? But boy, was I in for a letdown. Watching this sports comedy felt like biting into a flashy-looking candy that turns out to be stale inside. The film traces the strange journey of Shushan, a superstar soccer player for a Jerusalem team, who’s suddenly coerced into faking being gay to escape the wrath of a menacing gangster. Sounds like the setup for an insightful or at least funny story, but instead, it fizzles into a confusing mess that neither tickles your funny bone nor offers a genuine take on the heavy subject of homophobia.

Let me paint you a picture: Shushan’s world flips upside down after a clumsy flirtation gone awry with Mirit, a girl tangled in her own nightmare involving a ruthless figure named Mr. Black. To keep Shushan alive, Mr. Black forces him into an impossible public lie—claiming he’s gay. And this is where the chaos begins. Instead of solidarity, Shushan faces venom from his teammates, apathy from his management, and the cruel jeers of fans who mockingly rename him “Shoshana.” It’s downright painful watching how quickly admiration turns to scorn, revealing a harsh, unsympathetic world cloaked in the guise of sportsmanship.

What followed felt like a carousel stuck on a slow, dreary spin. In an attempt to capitalize on the situation, Shushan’s agent ropes him into a propaganda gig supporting the gay cause in Jerusalem—an angle so uninspired and disconnected it drags the plot deeper into boredom. Meanwhile, Mirit’s shifting feelings toward Shushan felt forced, as if the script was struggling to inject heartbeats into an otherwise lifeless narrative. At the movie’s end, Shushan reveals his “truth,” professes love, and—surprise!—everything returns to status quo. But by then, I was already checked out, wondering if the creators even thought about the message they were sending or the emotions they might stir.

Kicking Out Shoshana Review: Gal Gadot’s Sports Comedy Misses the Mark on Humor and Homophobia

What irked me the most was how this film masked its clumsy biases as humor. The jokes, often tapping into harmful stereotypes, didn’t just fall flat—they felt unpleasantly tone-deaf. Some lines managed to coax a chuckle, sure, but those moments were fleeting sparks in an otherwise dark cloud of political incorrectness. And honestly, Gal Gadot’s role felt like a mere decoration, her talent underused amid a cast of one-dimensional characters I found hard to care about. How someone of her caliber ended up in a movie that trivializes such complex issues puzzles me. It’s almost as if the script was built on a shaky foundation, and even solid acting couldn’t save it from collapsing into dullness.

Watching scenes where Shushan’s forced activism involves dull speeches and awkward school visits made me long for something, anything, that could breathe life into this tale. Instead, the whole experience resembled listening to a monotonous lecture, dragging on without purpose or passion. At times, I asked myself: why am I sticking with this? The boredom was so thick, it practically seeped through the screen. I left feeling that precious hours were squandered on a film that neither entertains nor enlightens.

So, if you’re hoping for a sharp, heartfelt comedy with a knockout performance, steer clear. “Kicking Out Shoshana” promises a lot but delivers very little—like a soccer ball kicked wildly off target. Trust me, some films slip through the goalposts, and sadly, this one is among them.

END
 0
Comment(93 Comments)
Chris Taylor
2025-09-26 09:56:34 回复

The film’s premise about faking queerness to dodge gangster wrath could’ve been sharp, but it muddles humor and homophobia without insight. Shushan’s teammates turning venomous instead of grappling with solidarity made the satire feel wasted. I think the stale candy metaphor captures why the setup deflates so fast—it’s all concept, no follow-through.

Sam Bond
2025-09-26 09:58:25 回复

I think the stale candy analogy really captures why the film didn’t land. The teammates’ over-the-top reactions after Shushan’s lie felt more jarring than funny, and the humor never quite meshed with the serious undertones it seemed to gesture at.

Jamie Lee S
2025-09-26 09:58:46 回复

The stale candy analogy really nails why this film felt hollow. Focusing on Shushan’s forced coming-out as a plot device but sidestepping the homophobia it triggers makes it seem like the script didn’t grasp the weight of its own premise. I thought Gadot’s presence might save it, but even she couldn’t salvage the tonal confusion.

Jordan Reed
2025-09-26 09:59:33 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay could’ve sparked real depth, but it seems like the writers leaned into stereotypes instead. Your candy analogy nailed it—so much gloss but zero substance on the homophobia angle.

Jordan Cole P
2025-09-26 10:00:16 回复

I think the critique about the film’s handling of homophobia hits home—Shushan’s teammates turning on him felt jarring. The satire might’ve aimed for edgy, but it seems to muddle the gravity of the subject instead. Gadot’s charm couldn’t salvage the confused tone they described, which is a shame given the premise.

Jordan Cole C
2025-09-26 10:01:10 回复

The film’s premise with Shushan faking being gay feels like a well-intentioned setup that just circles awkwardly into stereotypes. I wonder if the teammates’ hostility could’ve been an opportunity to explore homophobia in sports, but it seems glossed over for cheap jokes. That ‘stale candy’ metaphor really nails the disappointment—so much wasted potential.

Jordan Cole D
2025-09-26 10:02:06 回复

Your candy metaphor captures the film’s letdown perfectly. Shushan’s forced coming-out arc felt like such an interesting choice, but the way teammates react with venom instead of nuance—as you mentioned—makes it hard to see what the story aimed to say. It seems like neither humor nor commentary landed, which is a shame given the cast involved.

Jesse Taylor O
2025-09-26 10:02:52 回复

The premise of a soccer star faking queerness as a survival tactic felt like it could have been thought-provoking, but the way his teammates’ anger overshadows any satire left me confused. It seems the film couldn’t decide between slapstick and social commentary, which might explain the awkward jokes that missed for me.

Jordan Bond
2025-09-26 10:04:05 回复

The premise of faking queerness to escape a gangster could have been poignant, but I felt the uneven handling of teammates’ hostility vs. solidarity made the satire wobble. Your candy metaphor nails how its shiny surface hides how thinly it sketches the homophobia critique.

Riley Gray
2025-09-26 10:07:06 回复

The fake coming-out premise could have explored real tensions, but the teammates’ venom and apathy felt jarring instead of insightful. The film stumbles balancing humor and the homophobia angle, which seems muddled as intended satire. I wanted to like it but left confused.

Reader
2025-09-26 10:08:09 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay to dodge a gangster could’ve been sharp satire, but it seems like the script just glosses over the potential. The stale candy metaphor really clicked—there’s something hollow about how the film handles both humor and homophobia, neither biting enough nor thoughtful.

Jamie Klein A
2025-09-26 10:09:17 回复

I was intrigued by Shushan’s forced lie as a setup, but it seems like the film doesn’t explore the homophobia angle meaningfully. The teammates’ hostility and management apathy you described made the humor fall flat for me—too much chaos without insight.

Jordan Sims
2025-09-26 10:10:07 回复

The premise about Shushan’s forced lie could’ve sparked sharp humor or social commentary, but the handling of homophobia here feels muddled. It’s a shame the satire didn’t hit, especially since the setup with Mr. Black had potential. The jokes landed awkwardly, which made the tone confusing overall.

Jordan West
2025-09-26 10:11:10 回复

Your analogy of the stale candy really nails the film’s hollow vibe. The fake gay plotline could’ve sparked sharp satire, but Shushan’s teammates’ cruelty felt more abrasive than funny. I kept waiting for Gadot’s charm to shine through, but even she couldn’t salvage that tonal whiplash.

Clara Martin G
2025-09-26 10:12:04 回复

The ‘flashy-looking candy turned stale’ metaphor really lands—it captures how the premise teased depth but delivered emptiness. Framing homophobia through a forced lie could’ve sparked sharp satire, but the execution feels muddled, almost glossing over real harm. Even Gadot’s usual spark dims in a role that needed clearer intent beyond chaotic plot twists.

Jordan Cook
2025-09-26 10:13:05 回复

The forced fake coming-out angle struck me as awkward—using such a sensitive topic for humor without depth felt off. I’d hoped the film might tackle homophobia thoughtfully, but the reliance on stereotypes just left it feeling muddled.

Jordan Cole T
2025-09-26 10:14:01 回复

I kept waiting for the film to address the homophobia angle thoughtfully, especially with the gangster subplot, but it just added more noise. The premise had potential, but the tone felt confused—like it wasn’t sure whether to be a satire or slapstick.

Jordan Cole Z
2025-09-26 10:16:08 回复

The premise of faking queerness to avoid gangster retaliation could’ve been bold, but I think the muddled tone made homophobia feel like a narrative tool rather than something addressed meaningfully. Gal Gadot’s charm doesn’t salvage how awkwardly jokes land beside genuine hostility in locker room scenes.

Jordan Gray
2025-09-26 10:17:10 回复

The forced fake coming-out plot could’ve been a sharp satire, but it seems like the film missed by focusing on the teammates’ venom instead of exploring actual bias. Even the setup with Mr. Black’s ultimatum—which felt almost clever—ended up sidelined by chaotic gags that made the homophobia angle even more awkward to sit through.

Jordan Cole X
2025-09-26 10:18:14 回复

I like how you compared the film to a flashy but stale candy—that image captures the wasted potential. The premise of Shushan faking being gay could’ve tackled real issues, but it seems the focus on chaotic humor undercut any meaningful message.

Jamie Cole E
2025-09-26 10:20:12 回复

Your comparison of the film to a ‘flashy-looking candy that turns out stale’ is spot-on. The premise of Shushan’s forced lie had potential, but the messy execution left both humor and meaningful commentary on homophobia feeling undercooked.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:21:04 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay for survival had potential, but comparing it to a stale candy hit home. It’s a shame the chaos with his teammates didn’t dive deeper into the homophobia critique—it just felt surface-level, like the film missed its own point halfway through.

Jordan Kerr
2025-09-26 10:22:16 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay could’ve sparked meaningful commentary, but the venom from his teammates felt more like cheap drama than actual critique. I think the film’s confused tone made the humor fall flat when it mattered most.

Ethan Reid
2025-09-26 10:23:06 回复

The fake relationship premise could’ve explored deeper tensions, but the confusing handling of Shushan’s teammates’ hostility made it feel like a missed opportunity. I think the satire wobbles between slapstick and trying to say something meaningful about homophobia without really committing to either angle.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:23:55 回复

The setup about faking being gay to dodge a gangster felt like it could’ve explored homophobia more thoughtfully, but it just veered into chaos instead. I think the teammates’ hostility was oddly brushed over—like when they started pelting him with snacks, it seemed more jarring than funny.

Casey E
2025-09-26 10:24:55 回复

The forced ‘fake coming out’ premise already felt shaky, but the teammates’ overt hostility toward Shushan without meaningful exploration made it worse. I kept waiting for the humor to land or the social critique to deepen – it felt torn between slapstick and seriousness without nailing either.

Jordan Cole Y
2025-09-26 10:26:14 回复

I was intrigued by the premise of Shushan’s fake coming-out as a survival tactic, but the movie’s take on homophobia felt more like a punchline than anything sincere. The flashy-but-stale candy metaphor the author used really captures how it wasted potential. Even with Gadot’s charisma, the humor just didn’t land for me.

Jordan Ellis P
2025-09-26 10:32:38 回复

The setup of Shushan faking being gay to dodge a gangster could’ve been sharp satire, but the way his teammates instantly turn on him just felt lazy. It’s frustrating when a film uses homophobia as a plot device but seems hesitant to actually critique it. Even the humor around the chaos lacked punch, which surprised me with Gadot involved.

Riley Morgan Z
2025-09-26 10:33:32 回复

The stale candy metaphor really nails the disappointment here. I think the fake-being-gay premise could’ve sharpened satire, but sidestepping actual homophobia for slapstick makes the tone feel as confused as the teammate subplot.

Sam Ward
2025-09-26 10:34:32 回复

The ‘flashy candy turned stale’ analogy hits hard—you’re right that the fake-out premise had potential, but it feels wasted. I wonder if cutting some chaotic subplots might’ve let the homophobia critique land better. Still, the gangster forcing identity theater is such a squandered setup.

Jordan W
2025-09-26 10:35:23 回复

The stale candy metaphor rings true – it’s surprising how the fake coming-out premise never digs deeper. The homophobia angle felt like a missed opportunity, especially when teammates turned hostile over shallow writing.

Jordan Reid T
2025-09-26 10:36:34 回复

The forced fake coming-out premise had potential, but the messy tone didn’t land. Shushan’s teammates turning hostile instead of supportive seems like a missed chance to mirror real-world homophobia, as you noted—it ends up trivializing both humor and the core issue.

Jordan Klein
2025-09-26 10:40:21 回复

The forced fake coming-out plot had potential, but the way teammates turn hostile instead of introspective just reinforces stereotypes. I kept waiting for a twist where Shushan’s lie unravels meaningfully, but it seems they missed the chance to critique prejudice, not just mirror it.

Sam Rice
2025-09-26 10:41:24 回复

The premise of faking queerness for survival could’ve been sharp satire, but it misses the mark when Shushan’s teammates turn hostile instead of subverting expectations. I kept waiting for the humor to find its footing or the homophobia critique to deepen, but it feels caught between awkward jokes and half-baked drama.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:43:21 回复

The stale candy metaphor really nails the disappointment here—such a vivid way to describe a film that had potential. It seems like the messy handling of Shushan’s fake coming-out storyline overshadowed any chance for real humor or insight on homophobia, which is a shame.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:44:23 回复

Your take on the film’s confused tone really resonates. The premise of faking being gay to dodge danger could’ve sparked sharper satire, but it seems the toxic reactions from teammates just muddled the message. Also, that candy analogy? Spot-on—looks fun, tastes hollow.

Sam Carter
2025-09-26 10:46:45 回复

The forced fake coming-out plot had potential but veered into uncomfortable territory. I kept waiting for a sharper take on homophobia—maybe that scene where teammates turn hostile could’ve been unpacked instead of glossed over. It’s a shame; even Gadot’s charisma felt stifled by the clunky script.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:48:47 回复

The candy metaphor nails it—so much style but no substance. I think the gangster subplot clashed with the homophobia angle, making both feel half-baked. It’s a shame, because the premise could’ve sparked some sharp humor if the tone wasn’t so confused.

Jamie Cole Z
2025-09-26 10:49:46 回复

The premise of faking queerness to escape a gangster could’ve been sharp satire, but the way teammates turn on Shushan feels clumsy. It’s a missed chance to balance humor with the homophobia it (ironically) ends up reinforcing. Gadot’s charm feels wasted here.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 10:50:48 回复

I thought the setup of a star athlete forced to fake being gay could’ve been clever, but it’s frustrating how the film squanders it. The teammates’ hostility and management apathy felt like missed chances to dig into actual dynamics. Comparing the candy metaphor—it really does look better than it tastes, especially on handling homophobia.

Sam Gray
2025-09-26 10:51:42 回复

The stale candy analogy really nails it—such a vibrant setup that crumbles fast. I was hoping the forced ‘gay’ storyline would unpack something meaningful, but it seems to skim the surface of both humor and the real issues.

Sam Carter
2025-09-26 10:52:44 回复

The premise of forced identity performativity—especially Shushan’s teammates turning hostile despite his celebrity—had potential, but I agree it felt toothless. Comparing the humor to stale candy works; some jokes made me cringe more than laugh, and the homophobia angle wasn’t explored, just surface-level chaos.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 11:03:16 回复

The forced ‘fake gay’ premise could have been sharp social satire, but comparing it to stale candy feels apt – the humor crumbles when you bite in. I wish Shushan’s teammates showed more nuance; the cruelty without meaningful commentary left things feeling more confused than provocative.

Jordan Cole E
2025-09-26 11:04:15 回复

The fake coming-out premise had potential, but the teammates’ hostility and management’s apathy just made the tone confusing. It feels like the script waffled between slapstick and serious critique without committing to either—Shushan’s forced lie needed sharper writing to balance humor and the homophobia angle.

Jesse Cole B
2025-09-26 11:05:09 回复

The premise about faking queerness to dodge gangsters seemed like an interesting hook for exploring identity under pressure. But when the tension between public image and private reality just dissolved into cheap jokes, it felt like the film missed its own potential for sharper commentary alongside the humor.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 11:06:10 回复

The candy metaphor perfectly captures the disappointment—I thought Gadot’s role would bring some bite, but the homophobia angle felt mishandled. The premise had potential, but Shushan’s teammates’ hostility seemed more caricature than commentary. I found myself cringing more than laughing, which isn’t ideal for a comedy.

Jamie Carter U
2025-09-26 11:08:02 回复

Your candy analogy perfectly nails this film’s disappointment. The fake gay premise could’ve been clever, but Shushan facing his team’s hostility just felt like hollow shock value rather than exploring actual solidarity. It’s odd they made homophobia the plot device but skipped saying anything real about it.

Jesse Collins R
2025-09-26 11:09:09 回复

The fake-gay premise could’ve sharpened the satire, but Shushan’s teammates’ venom and management’s indifference seem to mirror real homophobia without critiquing it. The locker room scenes in particular felt like forced slapstick instead of witty commentary. I kept waiting for the humor to click or the message to land—neither happened, which made the awkward tone harder to ignore.

Jordan Reed O
2025-09-26 11:26:23 回复

The stale candy metaphor struck me—I felt that blandness too, especially around the forced ‘gay lie’ premise. It seems like the film could’ve tackled homophobia thoughtfully but ended up making both humor and message feel half-baked.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 11:27:28 回复

The premise of using a fake coming-out to dodge a gangster felt like a setup with potential, but the film’s take on homophobia seems more awkward than insightful. Shushan’s teammates turning on him could’ve sparked meaningful tension, but it ended up muddled without sharp humor or clear commentary. Maybe the concept was just too slippery for the script to handle.

Jordan Reid W
2025-09-26 11:28:23 回复

The gangster-forced fake coming-out premise felt like such an interesting setup, but the way homophobia gets trivialized here made me cringe. Comparing the film to stale candy seems spot-on—there’s a harshness to the ‘humor’ that never softens into anything meaningful, which the review captures perfectly.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:08:09 回复

The premise of faking queerness to dodge danger could’ve sparked sharp satire, but calling Shushan’s teammates’ reactions ‘venom’ makes it clear the tone just collapses. Gadot’s charm feels wasted here—I kept waiting for the humor to land, but the stale candy analogy nails why it never clicks.

Jordan Ellis S
2025-09-26 13:10:11 回复

The premise of Shushan’s forced fake coming-out as a survival tactic could’ve been a sharp satire, but the lack of nuance in how the teammates react just feels tone-deaf. It’s disappointing when a film borrows real-world issues but doesn’t seem interested in what they actually mean to people.

Jordan Cole K
2025-09-26 13:11:08 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay had potential, but it seems the film never digs into the uncomfortable implications. How his teammates reacted felt more like shallow drama than a real critique—I kept waiting for humor or insight that never arrived, which made the whole setup fall flat.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:12:02 回复

I thought the premise of Shushan faking being gay could have been a sharp way to explore homophobia, but it ended up feeling more like a shallow gimmick. The comparison to stale candy hits hard—so much flash without substance. It’s a shame the humor didn’t land either.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:14:02 回复

The candy metaphor nails why this film feels hollow—glossy setup without real flavor. Focusing on Shushan’s teammates’ hostility instead of exploring internal conflict made the homophobia angle feel cheap, not insightful. Gadot’s charisma deserved a sharper script, honestly.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:14:47 回复

The fake-gay premise could’ve been sharp satire, but the vague take on homophobia feels awkwardly hollow. I kept waiting for Shushan’s teammates’ hostility to develop into something meaningful, but it just sort of… evaporates? Even Gadot’s charm gets lost in the half-hearted jokes.

Jamie Lewis E
2025-09-26 13:15:00 回复

That candy metaphor really nails the letdown—looks vibrant but tastes hollow. I thought the homophobia angle would go deeper, but it skims the surface. Shushan’s teammates turning on him over a forced lie felt underdeveloped, like wasted potential for actual commentary.

Jesse Cole Q
2025-09-26 13:15:44 回复

That candy metaphor captures the disappointment perfectly. It’s a shame the script didn’t lean into Shushan’s forced lie more thoughtfully—the teammates’ reactions felt underdeveloped, missing a chance to balance humor with something real.

Ryan Lee
2025-09-26 13:16:48 回复

The comparison to a flashy but stale candy nails how the premise fizzles. I hoped Shushan’s forced identity would unpack homophobia thoughtfully, but the teammates’ venom just made it feel like cheap shock instead of satire. The missed opportunity stings more knowing Gadot’s involved.

Sam Reid
2025-09-26 13:17:09 回复

The metaphor about the flashy but stale candy perfectly captures the film’s hollow core. I thought Shushan’s forced lie had potential for sharp satire, but mishandling the homophobia angle just left it feeling more mean-spirited than clever. It really does squander its own premise.

Liam Carter
2025-09-26 13:18:11 回复

The concept of Shushan faking being gay had potential, but it’s handled clumsily—there’s no real depth to the humor or the homophobia critique. I kept waiting for a payoff that never arrived, which made the chaos feel empty.

Jordan Cole O
2025-09-26 13:19:06 回复

The premise of Shushan’s forced coming-out had potential, but the execution misfires awkwardly. The teammates’ venomous reactions felt more sensational than satirical, and the film doesn’t commit to unpacking the homophobia it gestures toward. A missed opportunity, especially with Gadot’s charisma in the mix.

Jesse Cole F
2025-09-26 13:20:07 回复

The forced fake coming-out premise seemed ripe for satire, but the film’s approach feels half-baked. I agree it squanders the chance to explore homophobia meaningfully—Shushan’s teammates’ venom just echoes real harm without adding insight.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:20:43 回复

The premise of Shushan faking his sexuality to dodge a gangster felt like it could explore real tension, but the execution just muddied the waters. Comparing the team’s hostility to stale candy was spot-on—it left a sour taste without meaningful payoff. I think the film’s confusion between farce and genuine stakes is what tanked it for me.

Jordan Lee
2025-09-26 13:21:03 回复

The fake coming-out plotline had potential, but the stale candy metaphor really nails why it fell flat. It feels like the homophobia angle got tossed around without any real depth, which made the humor miss for me too.

Jordan Cole M
2025-09-26 13:23:12 回复

The stale candy metaphor really nails the letdown. I think the film’s setup—faking queerness to dodge violence—could’ve explored homophobia’s nuances, but the chaotic teammates and flat humor made it feel more like wasted potential than biting satire.

Sam Fox
2025-09-26 13:24:03 回复

The candy metaphor nailed the disappointment—I wanted more bite from a plot about faking queerness to dodge violence. It’s odd how the film dances around homophobia without really confronting it, which left things muddled instead of sharp or witty.

Jordan Moss
2025-09-26 13:24:47 回复

The fake coming-out premise felt like wasted potential—awkward execution overshadowed any chance for sharp satire. I kept waiting for the teammates’ hostility to lead somewhere meaningful, but it just fizzled into flat jokes instead of confronting the homophobia angle properly.

Sam Carter
2025-09-26 13:25:00 回复

The forced fake identity premise could’ve been darkly clever, but mixing that with homophobia jokes left me uneasy. When Shushan gets harassed by teammates after his public lie, it feels like the film squanders any chance to unpack its own setup thoughtfully.

Jamie Ellis
2025-09-26 14:12:17 回复

The comparison to stale candy resonated – that premise about faking queerness had potential, but it seems like they prioritized shock over examining why the teammates reacted so viciously. Missed opportunities to blend humor with meaningful commentary made the whole plot twist feel hollow.

Jordan Cole
2025-09-26 14:23:22 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay could’ve opened up thoughtful moments, but the teammates’ hostility made the humor feel forced. The ‘stale candy’ metaphor captures the wasted potential—it seems like the film glanced past actual homophobia to focus on chaotic beats instead of depth or solidarity.

Sam Carter D
2025-09-26 14:26:24 回复

I think the movie’s premise of Shushan faking being gay had potential, but it’s a letdown how it skips exploring solidarity for cheap jokes. The teammates’ hostility felt more forced than funny, which made the homophobia angle land awkwardly.

Jordan N
2025-09-26 14:27:25 回复

The stale candy metaphor really captures the letdown—I think the film’s treatment of Shushan’s fake identity missed chances to tackle homophobia thoughtfully. Even Mirit’s subplot with Mr. Black felt underdeveloped, which could’ve added depth but just muddied the story.

Ryan Cole
2025-09-26 14:28:26 回复

The flashy candy metaphor really captures the disappointment. Shushan’s forced ‘coming out’ premise could’ve been sharp satire, but it seems to dance around the homophobia instead of confronting it. That locker room scene left me more uncomfortable than thoughtful, which sums up the tonal imbalance you described.

Jordan Lee U
2025-09-26 14:29:22 回复

The stale candy metaphor really hits home here—I was struck by how the film’s promising setup gets bogged down in chaos without exploring homophobia meaningfully. It feels like a missed chance to turn Shushan’s teammates’ venom into something more than just surface-level drama.

Jamie Lee J
2025-09-26 14:34:25 回复

The gangster subplot forcing Shushan’s fake identity felt oddly underdeveloped—it could’ve been a sharp satire, but the teammates’ venomous reactions just made the humor fall flat. I kept waiting for the film to dig deeper into why solidarity failed, but it never quite landed for me.

Jordan Wells
2025-09-26 14:35:22 回复

I went in hoping Gadot’s charm would carry the film, but Shushan’s forced ‘coming out’ plotline felt clunky. The awkward mix of mob threats and locker-room homophobia just left me wondering what tone they were aiming for—it never quite lands as satire or sincere critique.

Jordan Lee Y
2025-09-26 14:38:23 回复

The premise of using a fake coming-out as a survival tactic felt like it had potential, but the stale candy metaphor you mentioned really clicks. I wish the film dug deeper into the homophobia angle instead of letting the team’s hostility just hang there unresolved.

Sam Taylor
2025-09-26 14:40:23 回复

The premise of the gangster forcing Shushan to fake being gay had potential, but the execution felt muddled. I think the film’s attempt at humor undercut any meaningful exploration of homophobia, which made the conflicts seem shallow. A disappointing mix of wasted ideas and tone issues.

Sam Riley
2025-09-26 14:41:25 回复

The stale candy analogy nails it—the premise sounded intriguing but left a bland aftertaste. I’m surprised they used homophobia as a plot device without digging into its weight, especially since Gadot’s involvement made me expect more nuance. It’s a shame the humor didn’t land amid such messy stakes.

Sam Lee C
2025-09-26 14:42:19 回复

The premise of using queerness as a mob-dodging tactic could have explored societal tensions, but instead the film’s humor seems to deflect from deeper issues. I kept waiting for a meaningful twist when Shushan’s teammates turned hostile, but it just felt like wasted potential to address real homophobia.

Caleb M.
2025-09-26 14:44:25 回复

The premise of faking queerness to dodge a gangster had potential, but I kept waiting for a meaningful take on homophobia that never came. The soccer locker room hostility felt uncomfortably surface-level compared to real-world parallels. Shame the humor fell flat too—Gadot’s charisma deserved sharper writing.

Jamie Cole B
2025-09-26 14:46:26 回复

The forced ‘fake being gay’ premise could have offered sharp commentary, but it felt half-baked—like the homophobia angle was used for shock rather than insight. The chaos around Shushan’s teammates’ reactions just muddles the tone instead of digging into real stakes. Gal’s charm can’t salvage how flat the humor lands here.

Chris T.
2025-09-26 14:47:25 回复

The premise of Shushan faking being gay to dodge danger had potential, but I think the forced humor undercuts any real insight. The teammates’ venomous reactions felt exaggerated yet hollow, like the film couldn’t decide between satire and sincerity. It’s a tricky balance, and sadly this one stumbles.

Jamie W.
2025-09-26 14:49:18 回复

The flashy candy metaphor really nails how the film’s premise crumbles—the concept of Shushan’s forced outing could have sparked meaningful dialogue, but it seems the venom from his teammates just amplifies the mess without depth.

Jordan E
2025-09-26 14:51:24 回复

The premise of faking queerness to dodge gangster trouble felt uncomfortably forced, and that stale candy metaphor rings true—so much awkward setup with zero payoff. I think the film’s attempt to juggle slapstick and social commentary just left both threads feeling undercooked.

Jamie Carter R
2025-09-26 14:52:19 回复

The ‘flashy-looking candy’ analogy really nails why this fell flat for me. The premise about faking queerness could’ve sparked sharp satire, but it seems to dodge both humor and meaningful commentary. I kept waiting for that Gal Gadot charm to salvage something, but even she felt stuck in the muddle.

Jordan Lee S
2025-09-26 14:54:18 回复

The stale candy metaphor hit hard—I wanted to like this for Gadot’s charisma too, but the fake relationship twist felt more jarring than funny. It’s a shame the script didn’t dig into the solidarity angle instead; the chaos just left the homophobia angle hanging awkwardly.

Jordan Cole
2025-09-26 15:43:44 回复

The stale candy metaphor really clicked—I wanted to like this for Gadot’s role, but the fake coming-out plot seemed like a missed chance to actually say something about homophobia. It’s all chaos, no depth, which left me more confused than amused.

Liam Brooks
2025-09-27 19:49:23 回复

I think the idea of exploring homophobia through a sports comedy had potential, but it sounds like the movie didn’t quite find the right tone. The setup with Shushan’s forced lie could have sparked some really meaningful moments if handled with more care.

Sophie Klein
2025-09-27 20:03:23 回复

I really relate to the candy metaphor you used—it’s disappointing when a movie with such a promising cast ends up feeling hollow. The way Shushan’s teammates react with hostility instead of support made the whole premise feel even more awkward to watch, I think.

Sam Levine
2025-09-27 20:10:30 回复

I was also drawn in mostly because Gal Gadot was in the cast, but the storyline about Shushan pretending to be gay just felt awkward and forced. The way the teammates react with venom rather than support is pretty uncomfortable, and it seems like the movie never really finds its footing with the humor or the sensitive subject.